Most would say yes. With virtually no side effects and information on how to properly take the drug given to the buyer one might say that everything about this drug sounds great.
For example, one in Abortion+moral issue+essay of abortion might be unwilling to question the "fact" that a woman has a right to her own body, which means that a fetus has no such rights.
On the other hand, one who is against abortion might be unwilling to go beyond the claim that abortion is simply murder. It may well be that abortion is murder, but the debate will not be won by simply asserting that such is the case. The reason for much of the confusion on the issue is our human tendency to accept or reject basic moral principles without adequate examination.
Failure to conduct such an examination means that we improperly accept or reject principles that ultimately determine the direction of life.
Laymen are not alone in holding unexamined and untested positions. Scholars do it particularly well. Unfortunately, shoddy thinking abounds in scholarly literature on abortion. Rather than helping to clarify the matter, it appears that "scholarship" only muddies the water in too many cases.
It is the purpose of Abortion+moral issue+essay article to look in a critical fashion at a few contemporary attempts to express views on the abortion matter. My goal is to point out the inadequacies of these treatments as a sample of the kind of reasoning that is being used in our situation to defend the varying sides of this question.
My primary concern is to show that the most important questions are usually not seriously contemplated or expressed. Without such a clear presentation, it is possible for both ethicists and common people to go on holding positions without understanding the clear implications that follow from whatever position one chooses to adopt.
The second premise being, "Fetuses are innocent human beings. Warren's next move is not to deny the first premise.
To the contrary, she allows that it is "a self-evident moral truth. If the terms change meaning, one can no longer have confidence in the conclusion drawn from their use.
She suggests that there are really two senses in which the term human is used. The first sense is with regard to those who are "full fledged members of the moral community. The second is the mere genetic sense of the term. If one is then simply saying that a fetus genetically moves towards becoming a human in the moral sense, then Warren has no particular problem.
Her problem, however, is with regard to the applicability of the first premise to those who are only genetically human. Who are members of that "community" of humans to whom the premise, "It is wrong to kill innocent human beings," applies?
The question that then remains for Warren concerns how one will define this "moral community" for which the first premise of the argument has meaning and relevance. Her conclusion is simple and, she claims, "self-evident.
In order to see the truth of this claim, we are then directed to a consideration of what a person actually is. A good starting point, she suggests, is that we consider what elements we might look for in an alien form of life as evidences of personhood.
Five distinct criteria are listed. Here she emphasizes the true sense of the term as she intends it to be understood: This criterion is also elaborated as a complex and indefinitely varied ability. Conceding that much debate could be brought forth regarding these criteria, both with respect to what is found here and what is not, Warren is willing to accept criteria as a sufficient basis for her theory.
However, she says that if an entity is unable to fulfill any of these five criteria, it should be self-evident that it is not a person.
Her conclusion, then, is quite clear.The Moral Issue of Abortion - The Moral Issue of Abortion My essay is about the argument over abortion, whether it is right or wrong for it to be carried out.
Essay: Abortion – Prolife view. Abortion, the termination of pregnancy before the fetus is capable of independent life, can either be spontaneous or induced. it is regarded as a moral issue. Abortion destroys the lives of helpless, innocent children and is illegal in many countries.
An estimate of million are performed each year. In. Abortion is a difficult issue -- no one approaches it lightly or makes a decision about whether to have an abortion lightly. Abortion also touches upon a significant number of important, fundamental ethical questions: the nature of personhood, the nature of rights, human relationships, personal autonomy, the extent of state authority over.
Ethical issues on abortion essays. Posted on November 18, by.
Treaty of versailles failure essay, joseph raz the authority of law essays on law and morality abortion is the us constitution still relevant today essay help their eyes are watching god essay yolngu boy belonging essay. Abortion in the World Today Is an Ethical Issue Essay Abortion is the process in which the developing child is removed from a mother’s womb.
Abortion is an act of violence against the unborn child as well as the woman about to have a baby, apart from being a moral crime in itself. - The Issue of Abortion Medical abortion exists as the most controversial issue in modern society.
Abortion is a surgical or medical procedure that puts an end to a pregnancy. Abortion, to say the least, is a controversial topic in today’s society and has been for the last two decades.